Funchal Commercial Association opposes the increase in fees in Madeira

A Funchal Commercial and Industrial Association (ACIF) today expressed its opposition to the increase in the fees applied on the pedestrian routes of the region announced by the Regional Government, stating that tourism “cannot be treated as a looting sector”.

In a statement, ACIF “explains its deep displeasure at the succession of charges on tourism, in the context of increasing the cost of air travel and the slowdown of some demand indicators”.

“ Tourism is one of the main drivers of the regional economy, but cannot be treated as a looting sector. ACIF requires dialogue with companies, transparency and a serious assessment of the cumulative impact of each new burden before its approval,” he says.

The association considers that “the new prices of classified pedestrian routes are excessive”, referring that, from April 1, 2027, “the general rate for non-resident visitors should rise 66.7%, from 4,50 to 7,50 euros” on most routes.

ACIF points out that in four routes (Pico Ruivo, Ponta de São Lourenço, Caldeirão Verde and Balconies), “the amount announced goes to 15 euros, plus 233.33%”.

In the complete route of the Vereda do Areeiro, one of the most sought after by tourists, “increases 71.4% to 18 euros”.

“ The potential revenue from the three most sought-after routes may amount to around EUR 14 million, but the assumptions of this estimate and the planned application of the funds have not been disclosed”, says ACIF.

The trade association says it recognises the importance of preserving natural heritage and ensuring security conditions, but argues that increases must be “supported by data”.

“ It also considers it unacceptable that changes with this impact are announced in advance compatible with the procurement deadlines of the sector, leaving many companies unable to pass on new costs at agreed prices,” he adds.

The indicators of sleep and the heightening of air transport “make the accumulation of charges even more worrying,” says ACIF, reinforcing that “an overall estimate points to about EUR 90 million in fees and other tourist charges that may no longer circulate in the local economy.”.