MAI? Enough keeps time interval of the CPI, but specifies more the object

O the leader of the Aquida had announced on Thursday that the party would insist that Parliament be an inquiry into the performance of the current Minister of Internal Administration in the functions he performed before joining the Government.

This is the third attempt of Enough to force a commission of inquiry into the action of Luís Neves as national director of the Judiciary Police (PJ), after the president of the Assembly of the Republic refused the two previous proposals for understanding that the party did not detail the acts and decisions that he wanted to see investigated.

In this new potential document, the party led by André Ventura maintains the proposal to investigate all the time when Luís Neves was the national director of PJ, between 2018 and 2026, but specifies more the subjects he wants to see investigated, keeping focused on the polemics that have recently come to the public.

At the first point, in the first two initiatives, Aquida proposed “to evaluate the intervention of Luís Neves as director of the Judiciary Police” and now asks for a clearance of the “procedures and decisions adopted” by the former national director.

It proposes that Parliament assess “the definition by the government of the general guidelines for management and supervision of the JP’s management activity” during the same period.

As regards the assets seized in the context of the Pacoba operation, namely a chemical trailer, the Aquida maintains that Parliament must examine “all internal procedures adopted for delivery and destination” and understand the legal basis and whether all applicable legal rules have been complied with.

About the works carried out in a property of Luís Neves by the same construction company that made works for PJ, the Cávez wants to realize if there was a conflict of interest and if they were given “guarantees to award more works, by the Judiciary Police, that company”.

The party led by André Ventura also wants to examine the contracts awarded to ConstruBarcelos, Lda., in particular regarding “the conformity of the procedure chosen with the applicable rules, the adequacy of the price of the contract to the work carried out, the professional training of the contractor and his previous curriculum in works of the same nature, the justification of the classification of works as secret to the face of the applicable law and the subsequent omission of the publication of certain awards in the public procurement database”.

The Enough wants to know if there was any “conditioning or interference” in the journalistic investigation that revealed the works and analyze “the administrative procedures of registration, custody, custody, displacement, affectation and destination of seized goods”, by Luís Neves use a seized car.

The party also proposes that Parliament examines the PJ’s procedures for “the arrest, custody, custody and destination of a crypto-wallet, namely ‘bitcoins’, which eventually disappeared”, as well as the disappearance of weapons “which were in a restricted access room” of PJ.

The proposal also aims for Members to try to understand “the leak of sensitive information regarding the identity of PJ inspectors and SIS agents, during the mandate of Luís Neves, for the possession of the then Prime Minister António Costa” and to ascertain whether, “following the departure of the PJ from the investigation of Operation Influencer, the protection of PJ will have questioned the national director Luís Neves on what explanations were given to him for such a decision, and by whom they were given and, as well, if the explanations have led to the promotion, by the guardianship, of some of the planned supervisory measures”.